Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-17-2014 Minutes Work Session HHSDr. Charles J. Shackett, Superintendent 3497 North Ammon Road, Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83401  (208) 525-4400  Fax (208) 529-0104  www.d93schools.org Board of Trustees  Annette Winchester  Kip Nelson  Amy Landers  Brian McBride  Jeff Bird Bonneville Joint School District No. 93 is an Equal Opportunity Employer Marjean McConnell, Deputy Superintendent Work Session of the Board of Trustees Hillcrest High School Media Center September 17, 2014 11:30 AM Jordan Denkers, Hillcrest Studentbody President, welcomed the Board and administration to the school. He invited them to eat lunch with them at 11:40 a.m. I. Call to Order Chairperson Winchester called the meeting to order at 12:07 p.m. and turned the time to Mr. Doug McLaren, principal at Hillcrest. He welcomed the Board and District Administration. He also recognized Mrs. Crabtree for her efforts with the student council. She really cares about the kids and the school and is skilled at balancing some direction with letting the students do what they want with the school. These students put together a skit and some videos to present to our students at freshman day and at class meetings. The feedback has been very positive and helpful. A lot of it has to do with Jordan and his efforts as studentbody president and moving the school in a positive direction. Mr. McLaren then turned the time to Jordan Denkers who stated that Ashton was in charge of the videos. He asked everyone to introduce themselves. II. Roll Call Those Board members in attendance were Chairperson Annette Winchester, Vice-chairperson Kip Nelson, Treasurer Amy Landers, Trustee Brian McBride, and Trustee Jeff Bird. Others in attendance were, Superintendent Chuck Shackett, Deputy Superintendent Marjean McConnell, Director of School Improvement and Technology Scott Woolstenhulme, Chief Financial/Operations Officer April Burton, Director of Curriculum and Instruction Michaelena Hix, Director of Human Resources Shalene French, Energy Education Specialist Don Trauntvein, Food Service Manager Heather Plain, Director of Plant Facility/Purchasing Roger Hill, Director of Safe Schools John Pymm, and Board Clerk Valerie Messick. III. Welcome Visitors and Delegations Chairperson Winchester welcomed Hillcrest’s student council members and reminded them to sign the sign in sheet. Those in attendance were Dawson Hill, Sophomore Vice President; Kylee Cole, Freshman President; Emma Schweinsberg, Sophomore Activity Leader; Tanner Reilly, Junior Activity Leader; Tyson Kress, Sophomore President; Chandler Serr, Junior Secretary; Joseph Spencer, Junior at-large; Ashlyn Oswald, Senior at-large; Chris Ward, Studentbody Secretary; Kaeli Tschikof, Sophomore Secretary; Carson Biddulph Studentbody Business Manager; Caitlin Speirs, Senior at-large; Will Warner, Junior Vice-president; Marissa Norman, Dance Captain; Mikaila Stevens, Senior Secretary; McKayla Christensen Senior at-large; Abigail Pollard, Senior Activity Leader; Sephrd Miller, Junior at-large; Sarah L. Crofts, Senior Class President; Tyler Finch, Freshman at-large; Courtney Cushing, Studentbody Publicity Coordinator; Evynn Bronson, Freshman secretary; Tylor Marlowe, Studentbody Vice-president; Taisha Finlayson, Sophomore at-large; Payton Grover, IASC President; Gavin Slater, Studentbody Historian; Lexi Webster, Cheer Co-captain; Jordan Denders, Studentbody President; Alexis Simpson, Cheer Co-captain; Nic Southwick, Junior Class President; Michael Morgan, Freshman Vice-president; Sarah Pickett, Studentbody Female Activity Leader; Ryder Driggs, Studentbody Activity Leader; Ken DeSieghart; and Karla Harris IV. Hillcrest High School Student Council As a student council they hit the ground running with some good activities. They stood and recited their mission statement for the year that they made at their retreat at the beginning of the summer. They also wrote a personal goal, class goal, and school goal. Then shared those goals and read and analyzed quotes with regard to how to apply them to student council. The main ideas for the quotes were put together as their mission statement. They choose the right words to make it their own so they can interpret it and live by it. It is important that they are always trying to reach their highest potential. They want to make Hillcrest High School one unit and one body by embracing the little things. The focus is on every detail to make activities the best but also embracing the little moments as a student council so they can get to know each other and bond. They were involved in the 4th of July Parade this year – Tyler and Abigail showed pictures of the castle float they built. The entire student council helped put it together. It was a great activity to tie the community by working together in the community and participating in something larger than just the school environment. They showed their best school spirit and won the best school trophy for the 3rd year in a row. Freshman Day was a success. The student council helped them get comfortable. Students were united through games as well as a skit to help them understand what to do and what not to do. Council members helped freshman open lockers and helped them know where they were going. They really liked the videos. If people didn’t know where they were going there was always someone there to help them. Having the older kids get to know the younger kids helps to build unity. Senior Sunrise was a project that began last year. Jordan and Sarah reported they got 100 seniors to be at the school at 6:30 a.m. to watch the sunrise. Parents made pancakes and Orange Leaf donated frozen yogurt. They made a time capsule and added goals they wanted to achieve by the end of the year. Then they buried it and will bring it up at the Senior Sunset at the end of the year. They will then make another time capsule to open at one of their class reunions. It is important for the senior class to get united because it trickles down to the rest of the school. Chris talked about the back to school assembly and contests. On the first day of school they had an assembly to kickoff off the school year. They did a new teacher initiation and frozen tee shirt contests where they had to unwrap the frozen shirt and put it on. Payton talked about the back-to-school dance. It was after the first home game and only cost $1. The hope was to get as many people to participate as they could. Jordan then talked about several upcoming activities that are planned. He is excited for the school year and happy with the good group of students in student council. They are great leaders and he has learned a lot from them. He wants it to be a great school year. His vision is to come up with new activities to get different groups involved in the school. As a student council, he hopes they can make school a better place to be and get the unity that they are all searching for. Jordan thanked the Board and administration for eating lunch with them. Chairperson Winchester asked the students if they had questions for the School Board. There was a question regarding when split session might happen. There hasn’t been a decision on that yet. We are trying to run another bond in March. The outcome of that election will give us direction on what we will do. There is a high probability that we will have to go to split sessions at some point even if the bond passes. It takes three years to build a new high school and a couple of years to add on to existing buildings. There could also be some schedule changes. There was concern regarding how sports, jobs, and student council would be affected. Particulars have not been decided. An idea is to have the high schools run the same but then we could have all 9th graders meet at the middle school and have one middle school have 8th graders in the morning and 7th grade in the evening. There are several ideas out there. It would be very difficult to have split sessions at the high schools because it would be hard to schedule the gyms and fields for competitions and practices if we were holding classes from 6:30 in the morning until 6:30 at night. We are trying to think differently on how we can fit 11,700 students in a space that we have for only 10,000 students. There was a question about hiring additional staff to cover split sessions. It would cost about a million dollars to do split sessions. We would need to hire two staffs. There was a question regarding how split sessions would affect the District and whether people would move out. If we go to split sessions it would probably hurt us. Chairperson Winchester worries about our teachers because it is hard to recruit really good teachers and keep them. It would be hard on families and employees. There was a question regarding when split sessions would be instituted. It is about 50 -50 that it will start next fall. We might be able to delay it. There might be some things we can do. Right now 25% of your classrooms are not being used because teachers get preps. But if we went to a seven period day, it would go from 25% down time to 14% down time. That would allow us to put more kids into classrooms. So different schedules could help us divert going to split sessions. It won’t help with regard to restrooms and the commons area. There was a question regarding how student council would work if we go to split sessions. We are hoping to keep the high schools intact and try to push the split further down. There was discussion regarding the possible use of the Odyssey building. We do not own that building and it is not located in our District boundaries. We have thought of leasing buildings, but that costs money that we don’t have available. There was a question regarding how much longer Hillcrest can sustain a population like they have now. This year is the last year. Hillcrest’s capacity is 1250 and you are at 1480 now. But it will have to be as long as our tax payers will not allow us to fix the problem. We will have to have split sessions and more trailers to house our students. There was a question regarding how the District will promote the bond to get a more positive feedback. Mr. Ken DeSieghart is a professional who will survey the community to see what they will support. Then we will run the bond in March. We have a Secondary Facilities Committee Meeting today at 6:30 p.m. in this media center. There will be four meetings of about 2 ½ hours each and we have invited 60 people to participate. Half of them were against the bond. We have hired a facilitator to help us come to consensuses on what the community will support. It really comes down to whether we build a new school or add on to existing schools. The concern is the enrollment at the high schools. We will hire a publicity firm to help us publicize and counteract negative groups that may come out against the bond. We aren’t a political organization and need help to handle a political campaign. We really need this bond to pass. Chairperson Winchester welcomed any student ideas. There was a question regarding why there was so much opposition to the bond. (1) We believe it was because it would raise taxes. No one wants their taxes to go up and the economic climate isn’t very good. It would have raised taxes about $10 per month on a $100 thousand home. (2) People thought $92 million was too much. But it costs a lot of money to build a high school. (3) There was a group opposed to a new high school being built in their area. (4)There wasn’t as much detail in the bond as some people were hoping for. (5) We didn’t do a good job of advertising it. So, we will get some professionals to help us. It takes 3-4 years to build a high school. So, we have to build in extra into the bond incase costs go up. Sometimes it is difficult to be exact because of the lag time. The reality is that we need a high school and a middle school. Those needs won’t go away. Because the bond got voted down, we may not come out for the $92 million but, a few years down the road, we will need to come back out for a middle school. The public will pay the same amount that we bonded for initially but it will be in chunks. To build a high school now will be much more than it would have been when we bonded the first time. It will probably cost about $5 million more for the same high school. There was a question regarding the difference in cost for adding on and building new. Mr. Hill answered that question. The architects put together an estimate last summer. Remodels at both Bonneville and Hillcrest came in at about $34 million. For the new high school it was about $52 million - $55 million. There are a lot of issues when you add on. You would have a new lunch room that isn’t that much bigger added on to an old building. There are concerns about the commons areas. The add-ons would just be classrooms. There would not be another gym. Bonneville is now 40 years old and it needs more than just classrooms. We are looking at an additional $20 - $25 million to get Bonneville to the same level as Hillcrest. That would be about $60 million. Another school would give more students opportunities. There is a group that doesn’t want to dilute the sports opportunities. The students see a need for new high school because they are in the schools but, parents don’t see it. There was a question with regard to what things the District considers not being part of the new bond so it would be more favorable. The things in the bond for $92 million was a middle school for $25 - $30 million, a high school that would have been $52 - $55 million, and 8 classroom additions at Iona and at Woodland Hills. Those were all necessary and brought it up to about $80 million. We wanted to expand TCHS, we need a new bus barn, a couple of roofs, and a gym at Hillcrest. It is all in the eyes of the beholder regarding what is fluff and what is not. We went out for what we needed. So we went out for $92 million. Whatever we do now, we have to keep it in the $50 million range. If we keep it in that range, we have to decide whether we build a new high school or add on the existing buildings. Then we have to decide whether to wait for Iona and Woodland Hills. They need the classrooms now. The existing bus barn would have become a diesel mechanics and FFA. Those are real programs that we need. Dr. Shackett invited members of the student council to attend the committee meeting and listen. There is a hope to schedule field trips to the schools to see firsthand the conditions at the schools and become aware of the crowded conditions. However, people see what they want to see. There are differences in philosophy as to whether we want to build a complete school or continue to use existing facilities and fields. If you don’t build a stadium, fields, and gyms, you can save several million dollars. There was a suggestion to build a very nice sports arena for all three schools with fields etc. rather than build a small stadium. There is a safety concern regarding students traveling to a single facility to practice or to play. But, it has been working well for the students. There was a question regarding how long before a new high school will last before we would have to bond again. It would carry us to 2025 and then we would have to look at how to house students again. Dr. Shackett wondered whether the students would feel slighted if we built a football field with a new school. Maybe Hillcrest could use Sandcreek’s field .if the new high school gets a football field. You should give the new school a field because there are scheduling problems now. Trying to schedule three schools would be very difficult. There was a question regarding whether Hillcrest would have access to the second field. There was a question regarding what the Board expects out of the student council this year. The response was to do their best, help other students, get kids involved, and help them feel accepted. There was a question regarding additional requirements in school now and how that will affect fitting everyone into the same mold by heading students into college. There are other career paths that help our society thrive. How will that be addressed? Our Technical Careers High School is here to offer options to our students. We also have online options so kids can graduate early and move into the military or other interests. We want to offer what students need. There seems to be more of a push toward requiring more language, math, and science from the State. Those classes will help you in whatever you are doing. The District’s investment in the Performing Arts Center shows our support for the fine arts. We have made sure we have band and orchestra teachers as well as choir instructors. We have had outstanding student artists honored in our District over the last several years. However, more state requirements that are pushed down on us hurts elective classes and students choice. There was a question regarding whether the District is thinking of cutting the fine arts. We are not thinking of taking away the fine arts and that rumor is not true. If we had to go to a seven period day, it would affect your ability to participate in elective classes. We may have to eliminate elective teachers if we had to go to a seven period day. We have seen an increase in online credits earned so students can open up additional electives. There was a question regarding how the District would decide which students will attend the new high school if it were to be built. We would figure that the far south and the far north would remain at Hillcrest and Bonneville. Those living closer to the middle would go to the new school. We would have to consider it when we get there. Wherever the growth is at the time, we would probably put fewer students at that high school. There was a question regarding whether we could mandate that half of the students take online classes and then have them switch places with those going to the brick and mortar school to alleviate overcrowding. That probably is not feasible. Most students are minors and either we or parents are responsible to supervise them in a building. We can offer online, but we cannot require it. There are concerns about PE requirements. School sports participants have a class that counts as P.E but others do sports that are not related to school and then still have to take P.E. classes. We need to look at that requirement. Dr. Shackett believes that if students demonstrate that they are active in some sort of team or spending several hours daily outside of school in an organized activity, we should do something where they could get P.E. credit. We have worked it out individually for students in the past. If students work with their principal and he/she works with Dr. Shackett, and they can demonstrate that they are getting at least equivalent activity, we should be able to work something out. Some students spend a lot of time during the week for ballroom at the various studios around town. We understand and will work with students but they need to work with their principal. We are working with the state on that and we need to create a policy as well. There was a question regarding why the District doesn’t make Hillcrest the new middle school and then build a big 2500 student high school. That is an option. The problem is that we can’t get our patrons to approve a normal high school and the cost for a mega high school may be out of the question. A high school for 1500 students will cost around $55 million. A 2500 student could cost $65 million or more. There was a question regarding names and mascots for a possible new school. Once a principal is selected for the school, he/she then works with parents and students and then presents three mascot and name choices to the Board. The Board has the final say however, it tends to be what the majority living in the school’s boundaries want as long as it is not something offensive. Idaho is 49th in funding and there are teachers at the school that do not have a pencil sharpener because of funding. There was a question regarding what the Board is doing to help that scenario because if you don’t have the things you need, it doesn’t make sense. Parents and students need to talk to the governor and legislators and support more money to be allocated to the districts. We have a supplemental levy that gives us additional money to fund teachers. That will come up for a vote in November. Those of you who are seniors need to get those who are 18 in your building out to vote. You need to talk to your parents about the needs that you have and how important it is that we have local funds to supplement what we get from the state. There was a question regarding moving the 9th and 8th grade to a building and the 7th and 6th grade to another building. We have looked at that. But, we want to keep freshman in the high school because of the opportunities that are available at the high school such as honors courses, upper class courses, or electives. If 9th graders are in a school with 8th graders those opportunities would not be available. Ninth grade credits count for high school and 8th grade does not. That changes the mentality of freshmen in that type of school. They would be at a lower class school trying to get a higher class education and that doesn’t really work. Chairperson Winchester thanked the students for their questions and for thinking about each other and the other students as well as for being good examples and good leaders. V. Items for Discussion Chairperson Winchester moved into discussion items at 1:23 p.m. A. Patron Survey - Scott Woolstenhulme Chairperson Winchester asked Mr. Woolstenhulme to discuss the patron survey with the Board. Ken DeSieghart is here from Kansas City. His firm is Patron Insights. We had a couple of firms contact us after our bond failure last March and Patron Insights was the one with a lot of experience that is very specific to school districts and bonds. Mr. DeSieghart will be able to provide us with some good feedback through surveys so we can see what patrons can and won’t support. He will be available for the District leadership team meeting, the facilities meeting tonight, and the BEA breakfast tomorrow. Our survey in March had a good scientific sampling but there was no online availability for others to access. We did not target our staff either. We have no idea what our staff level of support was for the bond. We will have access to a lot more accurate information than we had last fall at this time and that will help us know how to proceed. Mr. DeSieghart is here to learn and listen so he can craft research that will get answers that you need to help make decisions about what the bond looks like, what people will be willing to support, where they get information about the District, and what they think about the District’s current performance because a lot of that feeds into their voting decisions. The core will be a randomly generated telephone survey spread across the district based on population patterns. This will give us a + or – 4.7% rating. That is good statistically from a planning perspective. They will also include online versions of the survey for the community at large. We want to hear from everyone who wants to weigh in and send a message that we are open to patron feedback. The online survey will draw more folks who will feel they have a chan ce to really let the District have it. Patron Insights will put the results in context for the District. There will be a version for the staff because they are typically the number one information source for the District. As we think about what to ask, we will focus on the three elements that need to be in place going forward. (1) How is the District performing? If the information is different than the District knows is happening, it helps us to focus our communication before the bond. (2) Where do you get your information? (3) What projects do they like? What don’t they like? What would they be willing to pay for? Maybe going back to things we have heard since the last bond election and see what they are thinking about these ideas and comments. This helps us separate the loud folks from the broad cross section of folks and what they think. You hear from the people who always like to bend your ear. We need to find out what a cross section of folks were thinking and what they heard from their friends and neighbors. The process involves the creation of a draft. The draft will go back and forth until you are comfortable that it is ready to go. He wants to make sure the survey will get the information the Board and administration need. Once that is approved, Patron Insights will spin it off into the online versions and staff versions. Callers are based in Kansas City they speak like all of us and they will not call at weird times of the day. They are good representatives of your school district when they call. The staff survey is an online version of the telephone survey. The company will help with promotional strategies to get people to take the survey and reinforce that it is confidential. The District will never see individual responses. Typically they get 50% -75% of the staff members who respond. Mr. DeSieghart believes we will get at least that much participation here. They will report how the typical cross section of patrons and staff members responded to the online survey. Then the gaps will appear. That can be turned over to the publicity people to close the gaps and clear up misinformation and promote the messages that resonate best with the folks we need to reach. Every project is unique. They lean on the things they know work. They usually work with school districts 90% of the time and the other 10% is not for profit institutions. They have been in 11 states. They will let us know what they think the information means to us and how to use it. They will unearth what people need to understand that they didn’t understand last time or what is different this time. They have found that about 80% of the people want to know three things: (1) What is in it? (2) What will it do for students? (3) Why should I vote for it? There was a question regarding the total number that will be surveyed on the phone. There will be 400 interviews that will give a margin of error of 4.7%. If the District is good in promoting the online survey, we could have 1,000 responses. The programing will not allow individuals to take the online surveys more than once. They will be asked to identify simple demographics online. Mr. DeSieghart will deliver bad news if it is there and steer away from leading questions. We want to close the door on the last bond issue and move forward and test areas that might be an issue. They will separate project ideas from the costs. The survey gives you the ingredients for the recipe and you will then know how to put the recipe together. Hopefully we will be able to build something that has a better chance of success. B. Spectrum Energy Proposal - Don Trauntvein, April Burton Chairperson Winchester asked Mr. Trauntvein and Mrs. Burton to discuss the Spectrum Energy Proposal with the Board and the information they have been able to glean regarding other ways to get the information. Mr. Trauntvein has done a lot of research and we will be able to do it ourselves more economically. C. 2009 Bond Funds – April Burton Chairperson Winchester asked Mrs. Burton to discuss the information regarding the 2009 Bond Funds with the Board. When we passed the 2009 bond we allocated $1.8 million for land. We haven’t spent that amount of money on land purchase and she requested to use those funds for other projects that were allowed in that bond. There are still $320,000 left in the bond fund for land. She would like to get that bond off the books and close it out. Mrs. Burton stated that she would reserve these funds in plant facilities so we have the ability to purchase land if needed. She will come back to the Board with a recommendation for reallocation of those funds. She wants to capture some expenses in 2013-2014 with regard to the single point entries. This is a tracking and management issue and not a financial issue. It would be an issue if we were in a market where we were collecting more in interest than we are paying on the debt, then we would have to give that difference back to the IRS. The bond payments won’t be affected. We don’t have the need to purchase additional land. There was a question regarding the land traded on First Street, and whether we would need additional property on the south end. We have land that is south of Woodland Hills in Courtland Ridge and another parcel off of 55th Street south of first street. D. Child Nutrition Charge Policy – Heather Plain Chairperson Winchester asked Mrs. Plain to discuss the Child Nutrition Charge Policy with the Board. Last year they were notified that Child Nutrition charges cannot roll over in that department. The District is responsible for those charges at the end of the year. They had about $8,500 on the books in charges. They started auto call and were able to bring charges down to $2,700 for our active kids but still had $1800 in charges for kids who left the district. They turned just over $4,000 to the District at the end of the school year. She is asking for a Board policy on those charges because everyone in the District needs to know the policy. It has become a District issue not just a Child Nutrition issue. It hinders foodservices as well when parents aren’t paying their bill. Mrs. Plain will submit a policy proposal for the Board to look at. Students in K-6 will eat regardless of whether they have chargers. The automated phone call continues until parents pay off the bill. The District will basically eat it for those who move away or don’t heed their phone call. We had one elementary with over $800 in charges. The biggest problem is the application for free or reduced price meals. People just don’t fill it out. Since Falls Valley has qualified for the CEP program that should help. They have cleared the slate of chronic charges. However, she is at $800 in charges already in just two and a half weeks. We can interface between the food service programs and our PowerSchool and receipting system. Currently, if a student checks out of school, outstanding fees are noted and can be collected at the school office before the student leaves. They will add any food service fees to that system this year. That should capture some of the outstanding charges when people leave the District. A lot of what we write off is people that have left the District and still owe a balance. After two charges students are taken to the back and told of the situation and given something to eat. Parents usually call very quickly. Mrs. Plain invited two parents to attend their PLC meetings last year. Those parents were ok with that policy. You have two sets of parents (1) can’t and (2) won’t. They talked about the threshold of how many charges they could allow. At two, it is $5 and that could open us up to $55,000 if every student took advantage of the two charges. It is difficult to turn charges over to the District. She really wants to have zero charges. We want to do what is right for the kids. For some of our students, this is the only place they do eat. If you have recess before lunch, the kids will eat more of the lunch provided. Mrs. Plain was on a national webinar representing our District and she does that very well at both the state and national level. They can buy what they need with food service money at this point. We just need to make sure everyone is on the same page with the policy. Kids will get an alternate meal. Chairperson Winchester thanked Mrs. Plain for all she does. They are trying to listen to the student committee regarding food served. E. Board Training Dates – Amy Landers Chairperson Winchester asked Mrs. Landers to discuss changes in Board Training Dates with the Board. ISBA can’t train on the Saturday we wanted The Board discussed the possibility of having that training on January 10th or 31st. Mrs. Landers will try to arrange that meeting. For the ISBA Conference, Chairperson Winchester will call Craig Miller to ask if his students will make something for ISBA auction. Chairperson Winchester then asked if any Board member would like to add any agenda items to any upcoming meeting. She reminded then the Board of the first Secondary Facilities Committee Meeting to be held at 6:30 this evening at Hillcrest High School Media Center. VI. Call for Agenda Items for Upcoming Meetings A. Secondary Facilities Committee Meeting - Wednesday, September 17, 2014 - Hillcrest High School Media Center - 6:30 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. B. ISBA Fall Region Meeting - Tuesday, September 23, 2014 - Jefferson School District - 6:30 p.m. C. Work Session - Bonneville Student Council - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - Bonneville High School Media Center - 11:30 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. D. Secondary Facilities Committee Meeting - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - Hillcrest High School Media Center - 6:30 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. E. Regular Meeting - Wednesday, October 8, 2014 - 7:00 p.m. F. Secondary Facilities Committee Meeting - Wednesday, October 15, 2014 - Hillcrest High School Media Center - 6:30 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. G. Work Session - Lincoln Student Council - Wednesday, October 22, 2014 - Lincoln High School Room #3 - 11:30 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. H. Work Session - TCHS and BOL Student Councils - Wednesday, October 29, 2014 - District Board Room - 11:30 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. I. Secondary Facilities Committee Meeting - Wednesday, October 29, 2014 - Hillcrest High School Media Center - 6:30 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. VII. Adjournment Chairperson Winchester asked for a motion to adjourn at 2:23 p.m. MOTION: Brian McBride made the motion to adjourn. Amy Landers seconded. The vote was 5 in favor with 0 opposed and 0 abstentions. Motion was carried. APPROVED: _____________________ ATTESTED: _______________________ Chairperson Clerk Date: _______________________