Laserfiche WebLink
GPAThe aim is to increase the number of classes qualifying for a 5.0 grading scale. The plan decreases tile risk of reducing their GFIA <br />for kids taking these classes. Tile letter grade will show the same (A, B, C, etc.), The GPA will show up oil tile report card. Because tile <br />point systern will be different, tile schools will communicate to Students and parents that AP and Dual enrollment classes will be <br />weighted, The plan is to start using the weighted grading Scale Witt) Our Current sophonnores. Three are other high schools in tile area <br />using a weighted grading scale. Colleges look at ACT or SAT scores, class rank, and then GPA, The intent is to make Sure tile kids who <br />have worked the hardest get recognized for taking rigorous classes, This is a way to rank kids in a fairway. <br />The only way to draw tile line for approval hn offer weighted grading will b* those classes taken for college credit or AP classes that <br />approved by the College Board and the AP Board. There are requests for changes to the Valedictorian policy at this time. This been <br />discussed with teachers and they are in favor of the change. Chairman Lords expressed a need to have a public hearing. Mr. Hunt Would <br />like to expand the focus on credit dual enrollment. Mrs. McConnell stated that we have a committee working oil this, He would like to be <br />included and help get parents on board. We need to figure out a way to make these classes more available to all students. Tile question <br />was asked regarding flow we reward teachers for getting masters degrees. The state needs to step up and help us with that. Mr. Pymrn <br />stated that want to move forward and begin implementation next school year. We will have a public hearing on the weighted grading <br />scale at the May 8'�'regLllar meeting, We will get information on the website and get some press on this. We will talk with Wendy Norman <br />to advertise on twitter and face book. <br />Mr. Pynm stated that they are trying to encourage teachers to remove behaviors from grades. we want a system that we measure what <br />kids really know. We need something m address behaviors. We think dis important m teach the whole child and it is hard for a teacher to <br />draw the line between hphnmiurmndknmwmUgowbpnitcnmnsm8mding. We need to know how tomotivate students voberesponsible, <br />m turn work in oil time, and tv come m class ontime. We need ho have something different for behavior. Maybe the ability mparticipate <br />depends ona behavior grade. Maybe behavior needs to become part of the graduation requirement. Best Practices supports this <br />strategy. We will follow the Code of Conduct consequences. This would be a starting point to work with faculty on developing the rubric <br />for behavior, There was a question about what audits would uoin place if teachers don't use this procedure. px this time, teachers are not <br />required to do this. It might motivate parents to get more involved if there was some teeth to it. We need to have ways mmmodiaoy <br />students. We need to create a three-tier model of intervention. There was a question regarding whether we can we keep teachers <br />motivated to do this. Behaviors sometimes block any kind of learning, This will put more requirements oil the Teachers. We need m <br />develop this through PLCs and work through how that will look at each school. The middle schools are in Support 'd this concept onwell. <br />There was a concern that policies may need reevaluation because they don't want to work through the pLta and then have bturned <br />down by the Board. Uin problematic having behavior tied mgraduation. We encourage teachers mremeoh and retest academic material. <br />We need mb° able m earn some of behavior grades back. Maybe wo could show a line t, see where the student stands and then allow <br />them m gain back position. Somehow wm need m take out the subjective nature, The rubric will help solidify what ^outmoodins^means. <br />Uncooperative kids Would be supported to help their grades come up, We are seeing a one-to-one correspondence with behavior and <br />academics. If we could follow the same model as Lincoln in the traditional schools there wouldn't be a problem, but we cannot, We don't <br />have a good strategy to deal with tardies. Parents need to see the consequences of this behavior. If we separate behavior, allows grades <br />to reflect what students know and can do. <br />E� RenortvnUmomden(u Lincoln Hiah School ' Todd Hicks <br />Mr. Hicks stated that the middle building is 100 years old. It was closed for a year and then made an alternative school. We will change <br />tile front door mmake it have a friendlier look. |tina special order door that wu will retrofit. We have changed 30 windows nf the 8c,The <br />building ionn the historical registry we have m give notice when *e make changes, We can dn upgrade for energy efficiency and lighting <br />without notice. We intend to replace all windows over the next years. we will look for appearance and heat loss. The eCentor has been <br />recently upgraded. We needed to put in air conditioning and rewire all the way to the power pole. There are three full computer labs with <br />the ability to add another in the future. We also have power for a modular building. We can take lath and plaster off and fill in holes then <br />add sheetrock to give a brighter more modern look. We are putting ceiling fans in for air movement. They will move warm air down in <br />winterandinoummmrwmwiUohengedimnhonnto»e|pwithb,inguon|orai,up,VVhemwireno,ounrewodtpthebvi|ding.*ewiUputo <br />cover with a piece of steel the same color as the building. But, we will still have some draped wires. We have recently added uburglar <br />e|e,m. We have up dated a pump u, increase water for outside pressure. We have cooler water fountains »a the eCenmr. We have <br />removed the old steam traps to take away the daily noise and distribute heat more equally. Wedv the best we can m keep the buildings <br />operable. The old buildings are hard to keep upgraded. There are two rooms upstairs that were deemed unsafe years ago. We need <br />more ancillary office space here but it Will take $ao $40 thousand to bring that space up to code. You don't get a full ceiling in that space <br />and we are not sure the stairwell is able to be used safely. It may be best to build new rooms. <br />C. Sale of District pmuanv— Roger Hill <br />Mr. Hill reported that when the District bought property fo Mountain Valley Elementary, wo needed a second exit. We had mgnthrough <br />4.a acres that wm didn't own. We then had to purchase the property for a higher price. The current appraisal was $31,500 per lot we have <br />Put $av.5o5 into theses lots. Mr. Hill will check with Doug Nelson to see what we need to do to proceed with advertising and selling the <br />property. <br />Mr. Hill reported that custodial, maintenance, and receiving have moved into the new building, <br />Mr. Pymm asked if fie could announce the new basketball coach pending approval. Chairman Lords is inclined to wait until the regular <br />meeting where the name will beon the consent agenda for approval, <br />Chairman Lords asked for agenda items for the upcoming meetings, <br />VI. Call for Anenda Items for Uncominomeetinno <br />a.megmiminnsM*etmU — Tvood May r.ao13' District Board Room —4onpm. <br />B. Regular Meeting —Wednesday May 8, 2013 - 7:00 p.m. Notice a public hearing for input on the proposed weighted grading scale at the <br />high schools. <br />C. Negotiations Meeting Thursday May 9.00i3'District Board Room —4:Sopm, <br />B.HiUomst Graduation — May 22. 2013 <br />